Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates AI risk perception and adoption willingness among 139 technology students across disciplines using explicit risk ratings and scenario-based assessments. Results reveal a significant discrepancy between students' concern for explicitly stated risks versus scenario-embedded risks, an inverse relationship between perceived risk and adoption willingness, and a "risk underappreciation" phenomenon among AI-specialized students. These findings highlight the necessity for tailored AI literacy education to promote responsible AI adoption.
AI students simultaneously overestimate explicit risks and underestimate scenario-based risks, leading to potentially reckless adoption despite stated awareness.
As AI becomes increasingly embedded across societal domains, understanding how future AI practitioners, particularly technology students, perceive its risks is essential for responsible development and adoption. This study analyzed responses from 139 students in Computer Science, Data Science/Data Analytics, and other disciplines using both explicit AI risk ratings and scenario-based assessments of risk and adoption willingness. Four key findings emerged: (1) Students expressed substantially higher concern for concrete, explicitly stated risks than for abstract or scenario-embedded risks; (2) Perceived risk and willingness to adopt AI demonstrated a clear inverse relationship; (3) Although technical education narrowed gender differences in risk awareness, male students reported higher adoption willingness; and (4) A form of"risk underappreciation"was observed, wherein students in AI-related specializations showed both elevated explicit risk awareness and higher willingness to adopt AI, despite lower recognition of risks in applied scenarios. These findings underscore the need for differentiated AI literacy strategies that bridge the gap between awareness and responsible adoption and offer valuable insights for educators, policymakers, industry leaders, and academic institutions aiming to cultivate ethically informed and socially responsible AI practitioners.