Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper presents a qualitative study on the experiences of Trusted Flaggers (TFs) under the EU Digital Services Act (DSA), one year after its implementation. Through interviews with seven TF organizations and a collaborative workshop, the authors investigated the challenges and impacts of TF accreditation on their interactions with online platforms and users. The study reveals that TFs face cumbersome accreditation processes, stagnant resources despite increased workload, and misaligned priorities with platforms, highlighting the need for improved support and standardization.
Despite being a key mechanism for managing harmful online content under the EU's Digital Services Act, Trusted Flaggers are struggling with cumbersome processes, inadequate resources, and misaligned priorities with platforms.
The European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA) introduced regulatory mechanisms which serve as a way to manage harmful content online. The recognition of Trusted Flaggers (TFs) is one such mechanism which accredits entities with experience, platform independence, and skill in identifying and reporting illegal content. With the DSA's TF role being roughly one year old, we interviewed representatives of seven such TF organizations to learn about their experiences of becoming a TF and how it impacts their interactions with online platforms and with individual users. We additionally ran a workshop involving TF representatives, primarily as it was requested by TFs themselves, who collectively wanted to share experiences of their new role and learn from each other rather than be isolated. Notably, we found that accreditation as a TF can be cumbersome, that resources for TFs remain the same despite an increasing workload, and that platforms priorities often diverge from TFs. We conclude with recommendations for future research into understanding user representation within the DSA and the need for standardization measures tailored to the needs and resource constraints of TFs.