Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces LIBERO-Para, a benchmark to evaluate the paraphrase robustness of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models in robotic manipulation tasks. Experiments across seven VLA models (0.6B-7.5B) reveal a significant performance drop (22-52 pp) when instructions are paraphrased, particularly due to object-level lexical variations. Analysis using a new metric, PRIDE, shows that the performance degradation is primarily due to planning-level trajectory divergence, highlighting a reliance on surface-level matching rather than semantic understanding.
VLA models, despite strong performance, crumble under simple paraphrasing of instructions, revealing a surprising lack of semantic grounding in robotic manipulation tasks.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve strong performance in robotic manipulation by leveraging pre-trained vision-language backbones. However, in downstream robotic settings, they are typically fine-tuned with limited data, leading to overfitting to specific instruction formulations and leaving robustness to paraphrased instructions underexplored. To study this gap, we introduce LIBERO-Para, a controlled benchmark that independently varies action expressions and object references for fine-grained analysis of linguistic generalization. Across seven VLA configurations (0.6B-7.5B), we observe consistent performance degradation of 22-52 pp under paraphrasing. This degradation is primarily driven by object-level lexical variation: even simple synonym substitutions cause large drops, indicating reliance on surface-level matching rather than semantic grounding. Moreover, 80-96% of failures arise from planning-level trajectory divergence rather than execution errors, showing that paraphrasing disrupts task identification. Binary success rate treats all paraphrases equally, obscuring whether models perform consistently across difficulty levels or rely on easier cases. To address this, we propose PRIDE, a metric that quantifies paraphrase difficulty using semantic and syntactic factors. Our benchmark and corresponding code are available at: https://github.com/cau-hai-lab/LIBERO-Para