Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the relationship between NLP advancements, particularly LLMs, and our understanding of human language processing as studied in linguistics and cognitive science. It traces the evolution of NLP paradigms, comparing them to theories of human language capacity. The authors conclude that despite the impressive language abilities of current chatbots, NLP's progress has not significantly advanced our understanding of human language processing.
LLMs' impressive language skills haven't actually taught us much about how *humans* understand language.
In this paper, we discuss the relationship between natural language processing by computers (NLP) and the understanding of the human language capacity, as studied by linguistics and cognitive science. We outline the evolution of NLP from its beginnings until the age of large language models, and highlight for each of its main paradigms some similarities and differences with theories of the human language capacity. We conclude that the evolution of language technology has not substantially deepened our understanding of how human minds process natural language, despite the impressive language abilities attained by current chatbots using artificial neural networks.