Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper advocates for a shift from monolithic AI models to composable neuro-symbolic architectures, emphasizing the importance of modularity and transparency. It introduces "symbolic seams" as explicit architectural breakpoints that enforce inspectable, typed boundary objects and versioned constraint bundles. The authors argue that this approach combines the adaptability of learned components with the verifiability of symbolic constraints, leading to more extensible, transparent, and evolvable AI systems.
Symbolic seams offer a blueprint for AI systems that are not black boxes, but assemblies of interchangeable parts, paving the way for more transparent and adaptable AI.
Current Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are frequently built around monolithic models that entangle perception, reasoning, and decision-making, a design that often conflicts with established software architecture principles. Large Language Models (LLMs) amplify this tendency, offering scale but limited transparency and adaptability. To address this, we argue for composability as a guiding principle that treats AI as a living architecture rather than a fixed artifact. We introduce symbolic seams: explicit architectural breakpoints where a system commits to inspectable, typed boundary objects, versioned constraint bundles, and decision traces. We describe how seams enable a composable neuro-symbolic design that combines the data-driven adaptability of learned components with the verifiability of explicit symbolic constraints -- combining strengths neither paradigm achieves alone. By treating AI systems as assemblies of interchangeable parts rather than indivisible wholes, we outline a direction for intelligent systems that are extensible, transparent, and amenable to principled evolution.