Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces VTC-Bench, a new benchmark to evaluate the ability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to use and compose visual tools for complex tasks. VTC-Bench features a diverse set of 32 OpenCV-based visual operations and 680 curated problems with ground-truth execution trajectories, designed to mimic real-world computer vision pipelines. Experiments on 19 leading MLLMs reveal limitations in adapting to diverse tool-sets, generalizing to unseen operations, and formulating efficient multi-tool composition plans, with the best model achieving only 51% accuracy.
Today's best multimodal models can only solve half of compositional visual tool-use tasks, revealing a critical gap in their ability to plan and execute complex, multi-step visual reasoning.
Recent advancements extend Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) beyond standard visual question answering to utilizing external tools for advanced visual tasks. Despite this progress, precisely executing and effectively composing diverse tools for complex tasks remain persistent bottleneck. Constrained by sparse tool-sets and simple tool-use trajectories, existing benchmarks fail to capture complex and diverse tool interactions, falling short in evaluating model performance under practical, real-world conditions. To bridge this gap, we introduce VisualToolChain-Bench(VTC-Bench), a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate tool-use proficiency in MLLMs. To align with realistic computer vision pipelines, our framework features 32 diverse OpenCV-based visual operations. This rich tool-set enables extensive combinations, allowing VTC-Bench to rigorously assess multi-tool composition and long-horizon, multi-step plan execution. For precise evaluation, we provide 680 curated problems structured across a nine-category cognitive hierarchy, each with ground-truth execution trajectories. Extensive experiments on 19 leading MLLMs reveal critical limitations in current models'visual agentic capabilities. Specifically, models struggle to adapt to diverse tool-sets and generalize to unseen operations, with the leading model Gemini-3.0-Pro only achieving 51% on our benchmark. Furthermore, multi-tool composition remains a persistent challenge. When facing complex tasks, models struggle to formulate efficient execution plans, relying heavily on a narrow, suboptimal subset of familiar functions rather than selecting the optimal tools. By identifying these fundamental challenges, VTC-Bench establishes a rigorous baseline to guide the development of more generalized visual agentic models.