Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates whether Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit something akin to motivation by examining their self-reported motivation levels and how these relate to their behavior across different tasks. The study found that LLMs report varying levels of motivation that align with behavioral signatures, task types, and external manipulations, mirroring patterns observed in human psychology. The results suggest that motivation serves as a coherent organizing construct for LLM behavior, linking reports, choices, effort, and performance.
LLMs aren't just mimicking text, they're exhibiting internal "motivation" that predicts their choices and performance, just like humans.
Motivation is a central driver of human behavior, shaping decisions, goals, and task performance. As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly aligned with human preferences, we ask whether they exhibit something akin to motivation. We examine whether LLMs"report"varying levels of motivation, how these reports relate to their behavior, and whether external factors can influence them. Our experiments reveal consistent and structured patterns that echo human psychology: self-reported motivation aligns with different behavioral signatures, varies across task types, and can be modulated by external manipulations. These findings demonstrate that motivation is a coherent organizing construct for LLM behavior, systematically linking reports, choices, effort, and performance, and revealing motivational dynamics that resemble those documented in human psychology. This perspective deepens our understanding of model behavior and its connection to human-inspired concepts.