Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Hierarchical Autonomy Evolution (HAE) framework to categorize and analyze security vulnerabilities in AI agents, spanning cognitive reasoning, environmental interaction, and multi-agent systems. It presents a novel taxonomy of threats across these three tiers of autonomy, including cognitive manipulation, physical disruption, and systemic failures. The authors evaluate existing defenses within the HAE framework, highlighting critical research gaps to inform the development of more robust, autonomy-aware security architectures.
Today's AI agent security frameworks are failing to keep pace with the rising tide of threats arising from autonomous decision-making and environmental interaction.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents have evolved from passive predictive tools into active entities capable of autonomous decision-making and environmental interaction, driven by the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, this evolution has introduced critical security vulnerabilities that existing frameworks fail to address. The Hierarchical Autonomy Evolution (HAE) framework organizes agent security into three tiers: Cognitive Autonomy (L1) targets internal reasoning integrity; Execution Autonomy (L2) covers tool-mediated environmental interaction; Collective Autonomy (L3) addresses systemic risks in multi-agent ecosystems. We present a taxonomy of threats spanning cognitive manipulation, physical environment disruption, and multi-agent systemic failures, and evaluate existing defenses while identifying key research gaps. The findings aim to guide the development of multilayered, autonomy-aware defense architectures for trustworthy AI agent systems.