Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper redefines representativeness in dynamic data selection as coverage of dataset-level common features, and diversity as the inclusion of complementary rare factors over the training process. Based on this, they propose a three-component dynamic selection framework using a sparse autoencoder to score representativeness, a usage-frequency penalty to promote diversity, and a smooth scheduler to transition between core-pattern consolidation and rare-factor exploration. Experiments across vision and text tasks show that the proposed method achieves comparable or better accuracy than full-data training with over 2x acceleration.
Forget local geometry – this dynamic data selection method uses a sparse autoencoder to prioritize samples covering frequent feature factors, leading to 2x training acceleration.
Dynamic data selection accelerates training by sampling a changing subset of the dataset while preserving accuracy. We rethink two core notions underlying sample evaluation: representativeness and diversity. Instead of local geometric centrality, we define representativeness as coverage of dataset-level common or high-frequency feature factors. Instead of within-subset dispersion, we define diversity at the process level, requiring the selection trajectory to gradually include complementary rare factors over training. Based on this view, we propose a dynamic selection framework with three components. First, we score representativeness in a plug-in feature space to prioritize samples covering frequent factors. We instantiate this with a sparse autoencoder trained on the target dataset, using sparse unit activations to summarize both individual samples and dataset-wide factor statistics. Second, we realize process-level diversity by combining rare-factor sampling with a Usage-Frequency Penalty that promotes sample rotation, provably discourages monopoly, and reduces gradient bias. Third, we couple the two-dimensional scoring with a smooth scheduler that transitions selection from core-pattern consolidation to rare-factor exploration, without extra gradients, influence estimates, or second-order computations on the training model. Extensive experiments on five benchmarks across vision and text tasks demonstrate improved accuracy-efficiency trade-offs across models. Our method matches or exceeds full-data accuracy with over 2x training acceleration. Code will be released.