Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the syntax-prosody interface in L2 Mandarin learners by comparing 67 native Mandarin speakers with 67 Vietnamese learners using the BLCU-SAIT corpus and C-ToBI annotation. The research reveals that while high-proficiency learners converge on the quantity of prosodic boundaries at the Major Phrase level, their structural mapping diverges significantly from native speakers. Specifically, learners demote boundaries at Subject-Verb interfaces and promote them at Verb-Object interfaces, prioritizing fluency over accurate structural mapping.
Even when L2 Mandarin learners sound fluent, their prosodic structure can be fundamentally distorted, revealing a surprising divergence between perceived fluency and actual accuracy.
While second language (L2) learners may acquire target syntactic word order, mapping this syntax onto appropriate prosodic structures remains a persistent challenge. This study investigates the fossilization and stability of the L2 syntax-prosody interface by comparing 67 native Mandarin speakers with 67 Vietnamese learners using the BLCU-SAIT corpus. By integrating C-ToBI boundary annotation with Dependency Grammar analysis, we examined both the quantity of prosodic boundaries and their mapping to syntactic relations. Results reveal a non-linear acquisition: although high-proficiency learners (VNH) converge to the native baseline in boundary quantity at the Major Phrase level (B3), their structural mapping significantly diverges. Specifically, VNH demote the prosodic boundary at the Subject-Verb (SBV) interface (Major Phrase B3 ->Prosodic Word B1), while erroneously promoting the boundary at the Verb-Object (VOB) interface (Prosodic Word B1 ->Major Phrase B3). This strategy allows learners to maintain high long phrasal output at the expense of structural accuracy. This results in a distorted prosodic hierarchy where the native pattern is inverted.