Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces KLong, a 106B parameter LLM agent designed for extremely long-horizon tasks, trained using a novel two-stage approach. First, the model is cold-started with trajectory-splitting supervised fine-tuning (SFT) using a comprehensive recipe to activate basic agentic abilities. Second, the model is scaled via progressive RL training using data generated by Research-Factory, an automated pipeline that distills long-horizon trajectories from Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Thinking). KLong demonstrates superior performance and generalization, outperforming Kimi K2 Thinking (1T) by 11.28% on PaperBench and showing improvements on coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and MLE-bench.
A 106B model can beat a 1T model on long-horizon reasoning tasks, thanks to a novel training pipeline that distills knowledge from research papers and uses trajectory-splitting SFT and progressive RL.
This paper introduces KLong, an open-source LLM agent trained to solve extremely long-horizon tasks. The principle is to first cold-start the model via trajectory-splitting SFT, then scale it via progressive RL training. Specifically, we first activate basic agentic abilities of a base model with a comprehensive SFT recipe. Then, we introduce Research-Factory, an automated pipeline that generates high-quality training data by collecting research papers and constructing evaluation rubrics. Using this pipeline, we build thousands of long-horizon trajectories distilled from Claude 4.5 Sonnet (Thinking). To train with these extremely long trajectories, we propose a new trajectory-splitting SFT, which preserves early context, progressively truncates later context, and maintains overlap between sub-trajectories. In addition, to further improve long-horizon task-solving capability, we propose a novel progressive RL, which schedules training into multiple stages with progressively extended timeouts. Experiments demonstrate the superiority and generalization of KLong, as shown in Figure 1. Notably, our proposed KLong (106B) surpasses Kimi K2 Thinking (1T) by 11.28% on PaperBench, and the performance improvement generalizes to other coding benchmarks like SWE-bench Verified and MLE-bench.