Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the predictability of vulnerability sightings using time-series forecasting methods. It compares SARIMAX models, with and without VLAI-derived severity scores as exogenous variables, against count-based Poisson regression models. The results show that Poisson regression provides more stable and interpretable forecasts for the sparse, short, and bursty nature of vulnerability data, particularly when aggregated weekly.
Poisson regression tames the wild beast of sparse, bursty vulnerability data, offering more stable and interpretable forecasts than traditional SARIMAX models.
Understanding and anticipating vulnerability-related activity is a major challenge in cyber threat intelligence. This work investigates whether vulnerability sightings, such as proof-of-concept releases, detection templates, or online discussions, can be forecast over time. Building on our earlier work on VLAI, a transformer-based model that predicts vulnerability severity from textual descriptions, we examine whether severity scores can improve time-series forecasting as exogenous variables. We evaluate several approaches for short-term forecasting of sightings per vulnerability. First, we test SARIMAX models with and without log(x+1) transformations and VLAI-derived severity inputs. Although these adjustments provide limited improvements, SARIMAX remains poorly suited to sparse, short, and bursty vulnerability data. In practice, forecasts often produce overly wide confidence intervals and sometimes unrealistic negative values. To better capture the discrete and event-driven nature of sightings, we then explore count-based methods such as Poisson regression. Early results show that these models produce more stable and interpretable forecasts, especially when sightings are aggregated weekly. We also discuss simpler operational alternatives, including exponential decay functions for short forecasting horizons, to estimate future activity without requiring long historical series. Overall, this study highlights both the potential and the limitations of forecasting rare and bursty cyber events, and provides practical guidance for integrating predictive analytics into vulnerability intelligence workflows.