Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study compares experiential and instructional learning approaches in fostering metacognitive awareness among 126 university students using generative AI in a first-year engineering course. The findings indicate that experiential methods lead to higher immediate engagement and knowledge of cognition, while also promoting a delayed increase in the regulation of cognition over time. Ultimately, the results suggest that experiential learning not only enhances immediate understanding but also supports the long-term development of metacognitive skills in AI-assisted contexts.
Experiential learning methods significantly boost immediate engagement and metacognitive knowledge in AI-assisted education, with lasting benefits that instructional approaches fail to provide.
With generative AI (GenAI) entering classrooms the question to which teaching approach best supports metacognitive skill acquisition in AI-assisted learning becomes pressing. In this short-term longitudinal study we investigate two contrasting approaches: experiential learning encompassing hands-on approaches and instructional learning such as classical lectures. We conducted a quasi-experiment with 126 university students from a first-year engineering course which were distributed across the two conditions and completed a two hour session on learning with GenAI in the corresponding learning style. Metacognitive awareness which encompasses both knowledge of cognition (understanding effective AI-use strategies) and regulation of cognition (applying that knowledge in practice) was measured before and after the session. Additionally, students longitudinal metacognitive awareness was tracked over the trimester and assessed again five weeks after the initial intervention. Results reveal that experiential methods outperform instructional approaches in engagement and knowledge of cognition immediately after the intervention. By five weeks, the two groups converged on these measures, while the experiential group showed a delayed, continuous within-group increase in regulation of cognition that was not observed in the instructional group. This suggests that the benefits of experiential approaches extend beyond conventional educational settings to AI-assisted learning, and that knowledge and regulation may develop on different timescales under experiential learning.