Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SpatialWorld, a benchmark designed to evaluate the interactive spatial reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in real-world tasks. By integrating eight simulation backends and providing 760 human-annotated tasks across various domains, the benchmark allows for a comprehensive assessment of agents' abilities to gather visual evidence and make decisions in a vision-only context. The evaluation of 15 advanced agents reveals significant challenges in spatial task solving, with the best-performing model achieving only a 17.4% task success rate, highlighting the need for improved methods in active exploration and long-horizon planning.
Despite the advancements in multimodal agents, even the best models struggle with interactive spatial reasoning, achieving only a 17.4% success rate in complex real-world tasks.
Spatial reasoning is a foundational capability for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to perceive and operate within the physical world. However, existing benchmarks predominantly rely on passive evaluation (e.g., static VQA) or simulator-specific pipelines, failing to assess general interactive spatial understanding. We introduce SpatialWorld, a unified benchmark designed specifically for evaluating the interactive spatial understanding of multimodal agents in complex real-world tasks. Integrating eight heterogeneous simulation backends under a shared, simulator-agnostic protocol, SpatialWorld features 760 human-annotated tasks across diverse domains (e.g., household routines, travel, social collaboration). Agents must solve tasks under vision-only partial observability, actively gathering egocentric visual evidence and expressing decisions via a unified, text-based action interface native to MLLMs. For reliable evaluation, each task includes a human-validated initial state, a reference trajectory, and a terminal-state verifier. Evaluating 15 advanced agents reveals that robust spatial task solving remains challenging: the strongest model, GPT-5, achieves an average task success rate (TSR) of only 17.4%, while the leading open-source model, Qwen-3.5, reaches 14.1%. Further analysis exposes a clear mismatch between task success and execution efficiency, alongside substantial domain-specific performance variations. These bottlenecks in active exploration and long-horizon planning position SpatialWorld as a rigorous testbed for future spatial agents.
Tsinghua AI