Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces OpenBibleTTS, a comprehensive benchmark for text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis in 37 low-resource languages, addressing the disparity in synthetic speech quality across languages. By systematically comparing various TTS architectures on both in-domain Biblical text and out-of-domain material, the authors reveal that no single model excels universally; while Gemini-TTS garners the highest listener ratings overall, monolingual EveryVoice models outperform in intelligibility for several African languages. The findings highlight the challenges of achieving reliable synthesis quality in underrepresented linguistic contexts and emphasize the need for tailored approaches in low-resource TTS development.
No single TTS model excels across all low-resource languages, revealing a critical gap in synthetic speech quality that demands targeted solutions.
Recent advances in neural text-to-speech (TTS) and multilingual speech generation have substantially improved synthetic speech quality, yet these gains remain unevenly distributed across the world's languages. Existing models are still dominated by a small set of high-resource languages, while many studies of low-resource TTS are simulated on artificially downsampled high-resource corpora that do not reflect the orthographic variation and limited phonetic coverage encountered in genuinely underrepresented settings. As such, we introduce OpenBibleTTS, which is a large-scale benchmark for low-resource speech synthesis spanning 37 underrepresented languages. Moreover, a systematic comparison of various TTS architectures and large-scale speech generation models is conducted across in-domain Biblical text and out-of-domain material. Results show that no single system dominates across languages and metrics: Gemini-TTS achieves the highest listener ratings on most evaluated languages, but monolingual EveryVoice models trained on OpenBibleTTS remain strongest for intelligibility and are preferred in several African languages, while open from-scratch systems degrade sharply on out-of-domain text, revealing a persistent gap between broad multilingual coverage and reliable synthesis quality in underserved linguistic communities. We complement automatic evaluation with subjective human judgments, and open-source all processed datasets, alignments, and trained models to support future low-resource TTS research.