Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Microsoft ResearchFudanHunyuan TeamNTUPKUShanghai InnovationSJTUTencent AITJUJun 5, 2026arXiv:2606.07229The paper introduces MMAE, a comprehensive benchmark for multitask audio editing that evaluates general-purpose instruction-based editing across seven audio modalities. By establishing a taxonomy of task complexity and a robust rubric-based evaluation framework, the authors provide a detailed assessment of current audio editing models, revealing significant shortcomings in their performance. Notably, the study finds that leading models achieve an Exact Match Rate (EMR) of less than 5%, highlighting critical gaps in their ability to execute complex audio editing tasks reliably.
Current audio editing models are failing spectacularly, with an Exact Match Rate below 5% in complex tasks, exposing a critical need for improvement.
We introduce MMAE, a Massive Multitask Audio Editing benchmark, serving as the first comprehensive evaluation testbed designed for general-purpose instruction-based audio editing. Spurred by the shift toward intelligent creation, interactive editing has rapidly expanded from visual domains, pioneered by models like Nano-banana 2 for images and Gemini-Omni for video, into audio. However, the current evaluation infrastructure lags severely, remaining highly fragmented and restricted to specific subdomains or basic operations. Unlike existing benchmarks that are limited in scope, MMAE extends to a broad spectrum of real-world scenarios, encompassing 7 distinct audio modalities, including sound, speech, music, and their mixtures. Furthermore, we establish a comprehensive taxonomy spanning 6 levels of task complexity, from basic modifications to multi-hop reasoning and multi-round editing, 2 levels of granularity, and 8 distinct operation types. Meticulously curated through human-agent collaboration, MMAE comprises 2,000 high-fidelity samples paired with a pioneering rubric-based evaluation framework. By decomposing free-form tasks into 17,741 verifiable criteria, this robust rubric-based paradigm enables a precise, multi-dimensional assessment of both instruction following and context consistency. Our extensive evaluation of leading models reveals that current systems remain far from achieving reliable edits. Strikingly, the Exact Match Rate (EMR) consistently falls below 5% and plummets to an absolute 0% in complex, mixed-modality tasks, exposing critical bottlenecks in precise execution and structural robustness. We hope MMAE will serve as a catalyst for future advances in the intelligent creation community, providing a clear diagnostic roadmap and establishing a standardized, long-lasting evaluation paradigm for next-generation audio editing systems.
