Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
FineVerify introduces a fine-grained self-verification framework that enhances agentic search by breaking down complex questions into checkable sub-questions. This method allows for more accurate candidate selection by verifying sampled responses against these sub-questions, leading to improved performance across multiple benchmarks. The results show that FineVerify significantly boosts accuracy for models like GPT-5-mini and Gemini-3-flash, while also providing interpretable verification traces for auditing purposes.
FineVerify boosts GPT-5-mini's accuracy by 8.2 points with just four sampled trajectories, outperforming standard scaling methods.
Agentic search requires language model agents to explore many sources and answer complex information-seeking questions. Scaling test-time compute is a promising way to improve these agents, but current approaches can fail, because correct answers are often sparse and score-based selection depends on model calibration. We propose FineVerify, a fine-grained self-verification framework that decomposes each question into checkable sub-questions, verifies sampled candidates against each sub-question, and selects the candidate with the highest aggregated score. This per-check structure turns selection into simpler local judgments and produces scores under the same explicit criteria. Across four agentic search benchmarks and two models, FineVerify consistently outperforms standard scaling baselines. With only four sampled trajectories, it improves GPT-5-mini by 8.2 accuracy points and Gemini-3-flash by 5.6% on average. With 12 samples, FineVerify enables GPT-5-mini to surpass frontier GPT-5 on BrowseComp-Plus. Beyond accuracy, FineVerify produces interpretable verification traces that help audit benchmark errors, suggesting broader applications for inspecting agentic search systems. Code and data are available at https://github.com/XuZhao0/fineverify
NUS