Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Intervention-Aware Variational Quantum Differentiable Predictive Control (IA-VQC-DPC), which trains a quantum policy while minimizing reliance on safety filters through a novel intervention budget. The authors demonstrate that their approach significantly reduces the quantum policy's pre-filter violations and safety-layer dependence without sacrificing energy efficiency, outperforming classical counterparts in safety and comfort. Their safety-attribution protocol reveals critical insights into the efficacy of learned policies versus protective layers, highlighting that a differentiable energy head requires a robust runtime guard for safety.
Quantum policies can be trained to be significantly safer and more efficient than classical ones by minimizing reliance on safety filters, revealing the true source of safety in learned controllers.
Hard safety filters are increasingly placed downstream of learned controllers to guarantee constraint satisfaction at run time. Yet a filtered controller that never violates a constraint may still have learned nothing about safety: the filter can silently repair an incompetent upstream policy, so that post-filter success measures the filter, not the policy. We argue that safe policy learning should ask who earns the safety - the policy or its protective layers - and we make this question measurable. We introduce Intervention-Aware Variational Quantum Differentiable Predictive Control (IA-VQC-DPC), which (i) trains a compact variational quantum circuit (VQC) policy under a primal-dual intervention budget that penalizes reliance on a differentiable Control-Barrier-Function (CBF) projection, and (ii) is evaluated with a safety-attribution protocol that decomposes the executed-trajectory correction into a CBF term and a deployment runtime-guard term, and stress-tests the policy with guard-off evaluation. On closed-loop, high-fidelity BOPTEST building-control emulators (5 seeds, 60 episodes per method), intervention-aware training significantly lowers the quantum policy's raw pre-filter violation and total safety-layer reliance (both p < 10^-4) with no significant energy regression; at an equal approximately 400-parameter budget the quantum policy is significantly safer and more comfortable than a matched classical policy. Guard-off evaluation confirms the improvement is policy-level and exposes a valuable negative result: a learned differentiable energy head is only safe when paired with a distribution-aware runtime guard. The attribution protocol is general beyond quantum policies and buildings.
