Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces WeaveBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate computer-use agents (CUAs) in hybrid interfaces that require long-horizon task orchestration across visual desktop control, command-line execution, and code editing. The benchmark encompasses 114 tasks grounded in real user requests, revealing that existing evaluation methods significantly overestimate agent performance, with the best models achieving only a 41.2% pass rate. By incorporating a trajectory-aware judge that assesses various deliverables and detects shortcut behaviors, WeaveBench highlights a critical gap in current CUA evaluation methodologies and provides a robust framework for future research.
Agents struggle to orchestrate GUI, CLI, and code operations, with top models only achieving a 41.2% success rate on real-world tasks.
Computer-use agents (CUAs) increasingly operate in runtimes that combine visual desktop control, command-line execution, code editing, browsers, and external tools. Existing benchmarks, however, often evaluate these interfaces as separable capabilities, leaving long-horizon cross-interface orchestration under-tested. Thus, we introduce WeaveBench, a long-horizon hybrid-interface benchmark with 114 tasks across 8 real-world work domains, grounded in real user requests and publicly verifiable artifacts. Each task requires agents to combine GUI observations/actions with CLI/code operations within a single trajectory. We evaluate these tasks on a real Ubuntu desktop inside deployed CLI-agent runtimes, augmented with a minimal desktop-control plugin. We also propose a companion trajectory-aware judge that inspects deliverables, files, screenshots, logs, and action traces, while detecting shortcut behaviors such as fabricated visual evidence or hard-coded metrics. Across frontier model-runtime pairings, the best PassRate reaches only 41.2%, showing the benchmark remains far from saturated. The trajectory-aware judge further reveals that outcome-only grading substantially overestimates agent performance. Overall, WeaveBench exposes a critical gap in CUA evaluation and provides an effective testbed to measure whether agents can orchestrate GUI, CLI, and code operations across long-horizon real-world tasks.