Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the integration of electronic health record (EHR) data in clinical AI systems, focusing on their ability to support longitudinal clinical reasoning. By developing a coding framework that highlights technical integration strategies and reasoning-relevant features, the authors reveal that most systems primarily utilize encounter-level data, lacking robust support for temporal reasoning across patient histories. The findings emphasize the need for a shift in how EHR data is utilized, advocating for systems that facilitate ongoing clinical reasoning rather than treating data as static inputs.
Current clinical AI systems often neglect the temporal dimension of patient care, limiting their effectiveness in longitudinal reasoning.
We present a structured analysis of how contemporary clinical AI systems integrate electronic health record (EHR) data and the extent to which they support longitudinal clinical reasoning. Drawing on a curated corpus of clinical natural language processing (NLP) and EHR-integrated systems, we develop a coding framework that captures both technical integration strategies and reasoning-relevant representational features, such as trajectory modeling, cross-encounter synthesis, longitudinal analysis, and absence reasoning. We also elicited the experiences of three physicians in their EHR use, including what strengths and weaknesses they found with their institution's current EHR system(s). Our analysis shows that while many systems incorporate EHR data, they predominantly operate on encounter-level or aggregated representations, with limited support for explicit temporal reasoning across patient histories. Reasoning-relevant structures are inconsistently represented, and evaluation paradigms remain largely focused on predictive performance instead of longitudinal interpretability. We argue that current approaches treat EHR data as a static input rather than a substrate for ongoing clinical reasoning, and we outline a framework for understanding how future systems might more effectively align with the temporal and interpretive structure of clinical practice.