Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
AgentLTV is introduced as an agent-based framework that automates LTV modeling by treating candidate solutions as executable pipeline programs. It employs LLM-driven agents to generate, execute, and repair pipelines, using execution feedback to guide a two-stage search process. Experiments on proprietary and public datasets demonstrate that AgentLTV discovers strong models across ranking and error metrics, improving ranking consistency and value calibration, particularly for high-value and negative-LTV segments.
Forget hand-crafted LTV pipelines: AgentLTV uses LLM-driven agents to automatically search for and evolve high-performing models, adapting to diverse data patterns and improving prediction accuracy, especially for critical high-value and negative-LTV segments.
Lifetime Value (LTV) prediction is critical in advertising, recommender systems, and e-commerce. In practice, LTV data patterns vary across decision scenarios. As a result, practitioners often build complex, scenario-specific pipelines and iterate over feature processing, objective design, and tuning. This process is expensive and hard to transfer. We propose AgentLTV, an agent-based unified search-and-evolution framework for automated LTV modeling. AgentLTV treats each candidate solution as an {executable pipeline program}. LLM-driven agents generate code, run and repair pipelines, and analyze execution feedback. Two decision agents coordinate a two-stage search. The Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) stage explores a broad space of modeling choices under a fixed budget, guided by the Polynomial Upper Confidence bounds for Trees criterion and a Pareto-aware multi-metric value function. The Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) stage refines the best MCTS program via island-based evolution with crossover, mutation, and migration. Experiments on a large-scale proprietary dataset and a public benchmark show that AgentLTV consistently discovers strong models across ranking and error metrics. Online bucket-level analysis further indicates improved ranking consistency and value calibration, especially for high-value and negative-LTV segments. We summarize practitioner-oriented takeaways: use MCTS for rapid adaptation to new data patterns, use EA for stable refinement, and validate deployment readiness with bucket-level ranking and calibration diagnostics. The proposed AgentLTV has been successfully deployed online.
